<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Underheight.com</title>
	<link>http://underheight.com</link>
	<description>Because Freedom Isn't Free</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 19:52:53 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>Comment on Go Tommy! by klokskap</title>
		<link>http://underheight.com/2010/03/01/go-tommy/#comment-8716</link>
		<author>klokskap</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 03:01:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://underheight.com/2010/03/01/go-tommy/#comment-8716</guid>
		<description>Thanks, made the correction.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, made the correction.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Go Tommy! by Zach W.</title>
		<link>http://underheight.com/2010/03/01/go-tommy/#comment-8715</link>
		<author>Zach W.</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 01:14:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://underheight.com/2010/03/01/go-tommy/#comment-8715</guid>
		<description>Feingold's seat is up in 2010, not 2012.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Feingold&#8217;s seat is up in 2010, not 2012.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Happy Birthday Jesus&#8230; June 17, 2 BC? by klokskap</title>
		<link>http://underheight.com/2008/12/12/happy-birthday-jesus-june-17-2-bc/#comment-687</link>
		<author>klokskap</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Feb 2009 23:29:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://underheight.com/2008/12/12/happy-birthday-jesus-june-17-2-bc/#comment-687</guid>
		<description>You know, I have read some of the Bible Code books.  They are fascinating.  

Thanks for the tip and the link to the site.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know, I have read some of the Bible Code books.  They are fascinating.  </p>
<p>Thanks for the tip and the link to the site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Happy Birthday Jesus&#8230; June 17, 2 BC? by K. Sean Prpudler</title>
		<link>http://underheight.com/2008/12/12/happy-birthday-jesus-june-17-2-bc/#comment-686</link>
		<author>K. Sean Prpudler</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Feb 2009 23:00:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://underheight.com/2008/12/12/happy-birthday-jesus-june-17-2-bc/#comment-686</guid>
		<description>If you do some bible code checking of the KJV New Testament, and set your ELS skip number to 617 ( 6 - 17, June 17th ), you will find the word ” Birth ” just once. But it appears like this.

.......B.......
.......I........
C H R I S T
.......T.......
.......H.......

Christ just happens to be written across the letter ” R ” of birth. The Bible also reveals the date of conception as Sept 11, 3BC. Another coincidence ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you do some bible code checking of the KJV New Testament, and set your ELS skip number to 617 ( 6 - 17, June 17th ), you will find the word ” Birth ” just once. But it appears like this.</p>
<p>&#8230;&#8230;.B&#8230;&#8230;.<br />
&#8230;&#8230;.I&#8230;&#8230;..<br />
C H R I S T<br />
&#8230;&#8230;.T&#8230;&#8230;.<br />
&#8230;&#8230;.H&#8230;&#8230;.</p>
<p>Christ just happens to be written across the letter ” R ” of birth. The Bible also reveals the date of conception as Sept 11, 3BC. Another coincidence ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Delete Files using the inode number by klokskap</title>
		<link>http://underheight.com/2007/12/23/delete-files-using-the-inode-number/#comment-528</link>
		<author>klokskap</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jan 2009 15:58:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://underheight.com/2007/12/23/delete-files-using-the-inode-number/#comment-528</guid>
		<description>I don't know what HPUX would do differently, but I discovered something that is a tad different in Solaris regarding the GNU v. non-GNU find commands.

This same issue may also apply in HP UX.

The followup post with that info is here: 

http://underheight.com/2008/06/18/removing-a-file-using-the-inode-number-in-solaris/

Good luck! And if you find an answer, please post it here too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know what HPUX would do differently, but I discovered something that is a tad different in Solaris regarding the GNU v. non-GNU find commands.</p>
<p>This same issue may also apply in HP UX.</p>
<p>The followup post with that info is here: </p>
<p><a href="http://underheight.com/2008/06/18/removing-a-file-using-the-inode-number-in-solaris/" rel="nofollow">http://underheight.com/2008/06/18/removing-a-file-using-the-inode-number-in-solaris/</a></p>
<p>Good luck! And if you find an answer, please post it here too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Delete Files using the inode number by San</title>
		<link>http://underheight.com/2007/12/23/delete-files-using-the-inode-number/#comment-525</link>
		<author>San</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 13:46:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://underheight.com/2007/12/23/delete-files-using-the-inode-number/#comment-525</guid>
		<description>Hi,

I am trying the command for deleting the file using inode number, but it neither prompts me anything nor it deletes the file.
Can you suggest !!
I am using HP-UX11i</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,</p>
<p>I am trying the command for deleting the file using inode number, but it neither prompts me anything nor it deletes the file.<br />
Can you suggest !!<br />
I am using HP-UX11i</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Joy in 2008 by Lew</title>
		<link>http://underheight.com/2008/12/02/joy-in-2008/#comment-421</link>
		<author>Lew</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 13:40:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://underheight.com/2008/12/02/joy-in-2008/#comment-421</guid>
		<description>Happy Holidays!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Happy Holidays!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Sherman, to the Way Back Machine! by klokskap</title>
		<link>http://underheight.com/2008/10/21/sherman-to-the-way-back-machine/#comment-378</link>
		<author>klokskap</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 04:42:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://underheight.com/2008/10/21/sherman-to-the-way-back-machine/#comment-378</guid>
		<description>http://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/10/us/politics/10caucus.html?_r=1&#038;oref=slogin

In the battleground state of Ohio, where Mr. Kerry lost the presidency to George W. Bush, the 2.74 million votes he received almost precisely matched Mr. Obama’s 2008 total. Mr. Obama won because John McCain received 300,000 fewer votes than Mr. Bush did.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/10/us/politics/10caucus.html?_r=1&#038;oref=slogin" rel="nofollow">http://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/10/us/politics/10caucus.html?_r=1&#038;oref=slogin</a></p>
<p>In the battleground state of Ohio, where Mr. Kerry lost the presidency to George W. Bush, the 2.74 million votes he received almost precisely matched Mr. Obama’s 2008 total. Mr. Obama won because John McCain received 300,000 fewer votes than Mr. Bush did.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Sherman, to the Way Back Machine! by klokskap</title>
		<link>http://underheight.com/2008/10/21/sherman-to-the-way-back-machine/#comment-373</link>
		<author>klokskap</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Nov 2008 21:39:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://underheight.com/2008/10/21/sherman-to-the-way-back-machine/#comment-373</guid>
		<description>POST ELECTION ANALYSIS THREE:

http://www.weeklystandard.com/weblogs/TWSFP/2008/11/pollsters_get_points_for_accur.asp

The 2008 campaign produced a record number of surveys, and it turns out that most of the major public polls were pretty accurate. That’s the assessment of Fordham political scientist Costas Panagopoulos, who writes:

    On average, pre-election polls from 23 public polling organizations projected a Democratic advantage of 7.52 percentage points on Election Day, which is only about 1.37 percentage points away from the current estimate of a 6.15-point Obama margin in the national popular vote. 

Most final predictions turned out pretty close to the final results--in part because this wasn’t a nail-biter. But Rasmussen, Pew, Polimetrix/YouGov and Harris Interactive were among the most accurate. 

[NOTE -- HOWEVER .....]

Many of the network polls, such as CBS, NBC and ABC, were near the bottom of Panagopoulos’s list.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>POST ELECTION ANALYSIS THREE:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.weeklystandard.com/weblogs/TWSFP/2008/11/pollsters_get_points_for_accur.asp" rel="nofollow">http://www.weeklystandard.com/weblogs/TWSFP/2008/11/pollsters_get_points_for_accur.asp</a></p>
<p>The 2008 campaign produced a record number of surveys, and it turns out that most of the major public polls were pretty accurate. That’s the assessment of Fordham political scientist Costas Panagopoulos, who writes:</p>
<p>    On average, pre-election polls from 23 public polling organizations projected a Democratic advantage of 7.52 percentage points on Election Day, which is only about 1.37 percentage points away from the current estimate of a 6.15-point Obama margin in the national popular vote. </p>
<p>Most final predictions turned out pretty close to the final results&#8211;in part because this wasn’t a nail-biter. But Rasmussen, Pew, Polimetrix/YouGov and Harris Interactive were among the most accurate. </p>
<p>[NOTE &#8212; HOWEVER &#8230;..]</p>
<p>Many of the network polls, such as CBS, NBC and ABC, were near the bottom of Panagopoulos’s list.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Sherman, to the Way Back Machine! by klokskap</title>
		<link>http://underheight.com/2008/10/21/sherman-to-the-way-back-machine/#comment-372</link>
		<author>klokskap</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 16:36:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://underheight.com/2008/10/21/sherman-to-the-way-back-machine/#comment-372</guid>
		<description>POST ELECTION ANALYSIS TWO:

http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2008/11/5/63522/1819/1/653924</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>POST ELECTION ANALYSIS TWO:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2008/11/5/63522/1819/1/653924" rel="nofollow">http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2008/11/5/63522/1819/1/653924</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
